Monthly Archives: May 2024

Evaluating Competitive Products

According to research from Harvard Business School, nearly 30,000 new products are introduced each year, and yet from that number, roughly 95% fail. Wow. That’s a lot of products trying to get consumers’ attention and gain their trust. And, that’s a lot of marketing expertise working to launch products that consumers truly want and need.

One way to make sure a product has an edge is to conduct research to compare and analyze competing products. Of course this is best done in a testing and evaluation stage, but no matter the stage, the importance of a positive review can’t be understated.

Research shows that consumers are strongly influenced by reviews – either from current users or independent testers. Positive reviews are likely to influence sales and build trust. But even negative reviews have something to offer marketers as these can identify problem areas that need to be quickly rectified.

There are many product testing reviewers out there, including work done by Consumer Reports, J.D. Power, Good Housekeeping, and Wirecutter (part of the New York Times). According to Wirecutter, they test and review thousands of products to save consumers the time and stress of shopping – whether it’s for gifts or personal use.

A valuable tool used for testing – the humble spreadsheet to measure strengths and weaknesses of products. Good gets colored green, mediocre is colored yellow, and failing attribute gets colored red.

Try it out and test a group of products. What should marketing say about it?

Group Activities and Discussion Questions:

  1. Poll students: How much do they depend on product reviews? From friends? From other sources?
  2. View Wirecutter’s website: https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/
  3. Here’s an example of recent evaluation for coffee pods: https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-nespresso-pods/
  4. Show videos: https://www.youtube.com/@wirecutter
  5. Divide students into teams. Have each team select a product line or service that college students might purchase. The product should be something with complexity and impact, not a commodity. (See https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/ for examples.)
  6. For each product line, have teams develop a list of attributes important to consumers. The list should have a minimum of five attributes or more. There should also be at least five competing products to compare.
  7. Each team should develop their own spreadsheet and testing protocol.
  8. Now, have the teams analyze the products accordingly.
  9. How should this information be communicated to consumers?

Source: Airhart, E. (7 November 2023). Wirecutter’s secret to making great picks: Obsessive spreadsheeting. New York Times; Wirecutter. (30 April 2024). The best Nespresso pods you can buy at the grocery store. New York Times.

Leave a comment

Filed under Classroom Activities

Apple’s New iPad Ad – “Crush”

Apple has long been a master of creative advertising videos. Its first Super Bowl commercial aired in 1984 was aptly titled “1984” and illustrated how Apple wanted its users to break free of dogma and routine by having an actor throw a sledgehammer through a screen – analogous to a threat from the “Big Brother” threat in the book “1984”. This in turn led to the “Think Different” campaign and the “Get a Mac” commercials comparing the creative Macs with the corporate PCs.

But now, the newest Apple ad for its latest iPad Pro has met with controversy. The ad shows a mechanical compressor crushing various creative tools, and lifting to show a thinner iPad – intended to support the creative process. But rather than being viewed as supportive of creative folks, it’s been seen as a metaphor for how creative work gets crushed by big technology companies. Ouch.

The timing of the ad is seen as wrong as many people today fear having their work replaced by technologies such as artificial intelligence, robots, and other tech advances. While Apple’s intention was to show how multiple tools can be replaced by its iPad, viewers have not seen it that way.

Sales of iPad dropped 17% last year and Apple is trying to revive demand and increase sales. The iPad tablets account for only 6% of the company’s sales.

Since the ad’s debut, Apple’s head of advertising has apologized to customers and will no longer air the ad on TV. Quite a turnaround.

What do you think?

Group Activities and Discussion Questions:

  1. Poll students: What is their general opinion of Apple and its advertising?
  2. Show the current “Crush” ad: https://youtu.be/ntjkwIXWtrc?si=r1O4eehes-qZseR
  3. What are the students’ reactions?
  4. Show news reactions to the ads: https://youtu.be/cKYaxnx5Vrw?si=dNs60CTWsyJ0cMLs
  5. Divide students into teams.
  6. Have teams research previous Apple ad campaigns online.
  7. Have teams create a storyboard for an alternative new campaign for the iPad Pro.
  8. What are its key messages?

Source: Grantham-Philips, W. (10 May 2024). Critics crush new Apple ad. Associated Press; Kieffer, B. (9 May 2024). After liberating creativity in ‘1984,’ Apple is crushing it, and the Internet hates it. Ad Week; Mickle, T. (8 May 2024). Apple’s new iPad ad leaves its creative audience feeling… flat. New York Times.

Leave a comment

Filed under Classroom Activities