The Strategy Behind the Scroll

What separates a clever marketing tactic from a successful marketing strategy? A tactic might earn clicks this week. A strategy connects those clicks to customers, revenue, and sustainable growth.

The Rhode Island Small Business Development Center argues that effective marketing increasingly depends on connected systems. Social posts, advertisements, email, search, and customer service should guide buyers through a coordinated journey rather than operate as unrelated activities. First-party data strengthens this system by helping organizations understand, personalize, and improve customer relationships. This does not mean familiar tactics have lost their value. Email, direct mail, and social advertising are strong performers when marketers select clear audiences, integrate channels, and measure actions such as purchases or appointments rather than focusing simply on opens and impressions. A postcard with a QR code, for example, can connect a traditional medium to a measurable digital experience.

Revolt’s transformation into Offscript Worldwide demonstrates how organizational strategy can make marketing strategy more powerful. By bringing content, creators, commerce, sports, music, and other media properties under one parent company, Offscript can offer advertisers coordinated access to audiences across multiple channels. The structure supports their value proposition: brands can build broader campaigns through fewer partnerships. CMO Erika Bennett’s work further illustrates that strategy requires internal alignment. Integrating public relations, social media, partnerships, strategy, and business operations helped Revolt increase social engagement and views. Those results did not come from finding one magical promotional channel. They came from organizing people and resources around shared goals.

In the end, channels matter, but connections matter more. Successful strategy aligns the organization, its customer value proposition, its marketing activities, and its performance metrics. Without that alignment, even wildly creative tactics can become expensive noise.

Discussion Questions and Activities

  1. What is the difference between a marketing strategy and a marketing tactic?
  2. Why might three proven channels – email, direct mail, and social advertising – perform better together than separately?
  3. How does Offscript Worldwide’s organizational structure strengthen its value proposition to advertisers?
  4. Which metrics best demonstrate whether marketing contributes to organizational goals?
  5. Review the RISBDC’s 2026 marketing trends. Which trend would be most important for a small business with limited resources, and why?
  6. Conduct an online strategy audit. In teams, visit the website and social channels of a company selected by the team. Use the HubSpot customer journey guide to evaluate how consistently the organization guides customers from awareness through retention. Present one strength, one gap, and one recommended improvement.
  7. Build a connected marketing system. Select a local business and map five stages: customer entry point, data capture, nurturing, conversion, and retention. Recommend one tactic for each stage.
  8. Turn tactics into strategy. Design a campaign combining email, direct mail, and social advertising. Define the target audience, value proposition, role of each channel, call to action, and two performance measures.

Sources:

Ad Age Staff. (10 August 2026). Erika Bennett rebuilt Revolt’s marketing strategy. Ad Age; Herren, P. (24 April 2025). How Revolt is changing its business model, and what it means for its upfront strategy. Ad Age; Rhode Island Small Business Development Center. (12 March 2026). Marketing trends for 2026: What’s changing & how established businesses can expand their customer base. University of Rhode Island. Zhang, K. (26 June 2026). I’ve managed dozens of brand campaigns in the last few months -These 3 tactics quietly outperform everything else. Entrepreneur.

Leave a comment

Filed under Classroom Activities

Bargains, Backpacks, and Brand Loyalty

Did you just finish your final exams when you started seeing ads for back-to-school shopping? Back-to-school marketing now begins while many students are still thinking about summer. Although the timing may feel premature, it demonstrates how marketers adapt to changes in customer behavior.

Rising prices have encouraged shoppers to plan purchases earlier, monitor promotions, and spread spending across several weeks. Deloitte identifies 31% of parents as “hyper-value seekers” who use four or more money-saving strategies. Interestingly, these shoppers expect to spend more than other consumers. This distinction illustrates an important marketing principle: customers seeking value are not necessarily searching for the lowest price. They may value price certainty, product quality, convenience, rewards, or reduced decision-making effort.

Retailers are responding with more than discounts. JCPenney’s Price Lock reduces uncertainty, while brands such as Target and American Eagle use creators to reach particular communities and interests. AI shopping assistants add another layer of value by helping customers compare products and locate deals. Together, these tactics allow marketers to connect with customers at different points in an increasingly fragmented purchase journey. Restaurants are also treating back-to-school as a customer need rather than simply a retail event. Family meals, advance ordering, loyalty rewards, and after-school promotions address the time pressure families experience when school resumes. The product is food, but the value proposition may be convenience, relief, or one less decision at the end of a demanding day.

The most effective back-to-school marketers therefore do more than move the season forward. They identify what customers are experiencing from budget pressure, busy schedules, or information overload – and design offers that make life easier. That is how a seasonal promotion can become the beginning of a lasting customer relationship.

Discussion Questions

  1. Using the 2026 Deloitte Back-to-School Survey, what finding offers the strongest marketing opportunity? Explain your choice.
  2. Is starting back-to-school promotions in June responsive to customers, or can it create promotional fatigue?
  3. Why might the “hyper-value seekers” described in the Marketing Dive article, spend more than shoppers who use fewer cost-saving strategies?
  4. Which creates greater customer value: a lower price, a price guarantee, convenience, personalization, or loyalty rewards?
  5. How can marketers appeal to both parents purchasing necessities and students influencing discretionary purchases?

Student Activities

  1. Investigate the market.Compare the National Retail Federation’s 2026 findings with the Deloitte survey. Develop one customer insight and turn it into a promotional concept for a retailer or restaurant.
  2. Redesign the offer. Select one restaurant promotion from Article 3. Redesign it to create an ongoing customer relationship rather than a single transaction. Identify the target market, customer need, value proposition, and retention mechanism.
  3. Map the customer journey. In teams, map a student’s back-to-school journey from need recognition through post-purchase evaluation. Add one appropriate marketing touchpoint involving a creator, an AI tool, a store, and a loyalty program.

Sources:

Adams, Peter (2026, August 18). Brands shake up back-to-school marketing to reach “hyper value-seekers.” Marketing Dive; Deloitte (2026). 2026 Deloitte back-to-school survey. Deloitte Insights; Kelso, Alicia, (2026, August 20) Restaurant chains rush to meet the back-to-school crowd. Restaurant Business; Nassauer, Sara (2026, June 20), Why back-to-school deals are already here. The Wall Street Journal.

Leave a comment

Filed under Classroom Activities

Your Feed Is Not My Feed – Or Is It?

For years, marketers have been told that monoculture is disappearing. Instead of millions of people watching the same shows, hearing the same music, and seeing the same messages, algorithms increasingly create individualized media worlds. Marketers have responded with personalization using data, digital behavior, and AI to deliver different messages to different consumers. But what if consumers also miss having something in common?

The summer of 2026 offered an interesting counterpoint. Events and entertainment including the World Cup and major movie releases like The Odyssey and Spider-Man: Brand New Day generated the kind of widespread attention that supposedly belonged to an earlier media era. Suddenly, people with very different interests had something to talk about again. This creates a fascinating challenge for marketers. Should brands pursue personal relevance or cultural reach?

Personalization offers powerful advantages. A brand can use consumer data and intent signals to make an advertisement, recommendation, or offer more relevant to an individual. Yet mass advertising can accomplish something personalization cannot: give millions of consumers a shared experience. Major campaigns from brands such as Coca-Cola, Apple, and McDonald’s can appear across television, streaming, social media, outdoor advertising, and other channels, allowing very different consumers to encounter the same creative idea. Perhaps monoculture and personalization aren’t opposites after all. A brand might create one big cultural idea while using technology to make its execution more personally relevant. That presents marketers with a new opportunity to create campaigns big enough to become part of the conversation, but flexible enough to make individual consumers want to join it.

Discussion Questions and Activities

  1. Watch the trailer for Spiderman: Brand New Day on YouTube. Do you think a movie or any other ad campaign can simultaneously create a shared cultural experience and deliver personalized messages? What might that look like?
  2. Is monoculture is actually disappearing, or has it simply become less frequent?
  3. Which creates more value for a brand: reaching millions with the same memorable message or delivering highly relevant messages to smaller audiences? What advantages does personalization offer marketers? What might consumers dislike about it?
  4. Monoculture Quest. Ask students to visit Google Trends and identify a recent event, product, celebrity, movie, sport, or cultural moment that produced a significant spike in search interest. Investigate whether interest was broadly shared or concentrated among particular audiences. If you were a brand manager, how could you participate in this cultural moment without making the connection feel forced?
  5. Same Brand, Different Feed Debate. Have students choose a major brand and compare the advertising they encounter for it across their own social feeds, streaming platforms, websites, and other media. In small groups, compare results. Did everyone receive essentially the same brand message, or did each student experience a different version of the brand? Discuss what this reveals about segmentation, targeting, and personalization and if one strategy is better than the other.
  6. Build the Hybrid Campaign. Assign teams a familiar brand such as Nike, Coca-Cola, Spotify, or McDonald’s. Give them a hypothetical $10 million campaign budget tied to a major shared cultural event. Teams must develop one big campaign idea designed for mass appeal and then create three personalized executions for distinct target segments. Have teams explain which elements should remain consistent and which should change.

Sources: Erich, Steve (12 Mar 2026), Why advertising is the last medium of monoculture, and why it’s worth protecting, Ad Age; Zuckerman, Esther (10 Aug 2026), The Summer That the Monoculture Made a Comeback, Wall Street Journal; Kapoor, Vibhor (4 June 2025), The Death Of Monoculture: Why Personalization Matters Now More Than Ever, Forbes Technology Council.

Leave a comment

Filed under Classroom Activities